W7 Firefox3.0
There are some benchmark (1, 2) where Firefox seems slower in Linux than in Windows (and even Firefox Wine is faster), but are those benchmarks really a "normal" user usages?
Firefox has some problems on Linux, but are not all Firefox issues. Some rendering perfomance could change a lot, most it depends which graphic settings you choose.
All the tests are done in the same conditions, with the web browser fullscreen at the same resolution 1920x1200 and the font size at 10px.
If you use different window or font size the results will be very different.
The benchmark is a javascript page avalaible here.
The first four browser are on windows xp, then I tested different combinations. The default configuration is:
The other options are:
The first four tests are from Windows.
(less is better, results in milliseconds ms)

In this test it's clear that the video driver used is the most relevant parameter.
Firefox-Wine tests are not present but it is 6000+! In this particular test Firefox Linux is faster than Firefox Windows, even if ctrl+wheel (zoom) is faster on Windows and the fglrx driver is 2X faster than the radeon driver.
The Webkit browsers: Arora, Safari, Midori, Epiphany webkit are not so quick to render the scrolling.
Konqueror doesn't run this test.
Chrome is very fast on Windows and not only in this benchmark, I hope to test the Linux/Gtk version soon.
Swiftfox(3.0.4) speed benefits over Firefox are not visible.
If you don't need the Firefox extensions Epiphany gives the best basic browsing experience on Linux, but even Firefox is not so slow. They both share the gecko engine.
Epiphany-WebKit is powerful but not at this micro-benchmark (but relevant in everyday usage).
Opera Linux is not the best browser to scrolling a page, but is the fastest to zoom a page. Unfortunatly I didn't find any micro-benchmark to prove it.
UPDATE:
2346 W7 Firefox3.0
W7 Firefox 3.6a1
1935 W7 Safari4
1203 W7 Chrome
1178 OSX Firefox3.0
OSX Firefox 3.6a1
1026 OSX Safari4
commenti
extended scrolling benchmark
I extended your benchmark by timing the scroll time for a large table inside a floating scrollable DIV.
The results for Windows XP are remarkable:
7078ms Opera 9.64
11942ms Firefox 3.0.10
13126ms Safari 4.528.17
15547ms Chrome 2.0.172.28
Chrome is very, very slow. Firefox is quite slow, but at least 10% faster than Safari ...
Chris.
benchmark page
it would be great if u could try the benchmark on ubuntu :-D
Here my link:
http://sliste.sl.funpic.de/bmark/
Thanks!
Chris
http://sliste.sl.funpic.de/bm
http://sliste.sl.funpic.de/bmark/:
Firefox (linux & windows-wine) 3.6.3
Chromium 5.0.375.55
Opera 10.0-2
Cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7300 @ 2.66GHz
nvidia driver 195.36.15
gpu: GeForce 9500 GT
Archlinux i686@32bit.
compiz + emerald:
chrome: 16674
firefox wine: 9183
firefox koko: 7375
opera 7188
compiz + kde4-window-decorator
chrome: 16954
firefox wine: 9185
firefox: 7376
opera 7235
kwin no effects
chrome: 16751
firefox wine 8640
firefox: 7341
opera: 6356
kwin + effects:
chrome: 17277
firefox wine: 8950
firefox: 7518
opera: 7242
Opera is the clear winner, while wine didn't performs so good.
Chrome was slower in any case.
results
I got this results on Ubuntu Linux 9.04, fglrx, FF 3.0.10
14191 lin
9819 lin (no composititing)
9742 mac
20219 win xp (catalyst)
restest ubuntu 9.04
i also tested it with native Firefox 3.0.10 (without ICC or optimizations) and fglrx with the nobackfill patched xserver
8010ms but the manual scroll feels very much slower ...
more thorough testing
I retested it with catalyst 8.6 on primary and secondary display on an ATI 4650 with XP and a E5400@3.5Ghz (dual core) I run firefox with a single TAB for the benchmark PLUS an optional empty tab and no other programs. (browser window is not maximized)
6950ms Opera 9.64 CPU 0%+0% with one empty tab
7153ms FF 3.0.10 CPU 0%+0% with one empty tab
7382ms FF 3.0.10 CPU 30%+70% with NO additional, empty tab
1270ms Safari 4.528.17 CPU 30%+70% with one empty tab
1520ms Chrome 2.0.172.28 CPU 30%+70% with one empty tab
I have Adblock enabled for FF! But no other plugin
When dragging the bar inside the scrollbar with the mouse MANUALLY it gives 50%+50% on opera and safari, 30%+70% on firefox, 20%+80% on chrome. The bar trails (lags behind) the mouse cursor in chrome and safari, where trailing distance is 2x as large in chrome. There is no trailing (delay) of the bar to mouse in opera or firefox.
There is no diff. between primary and secondary display. Minimized browsers perform much faster ;-)
My conclusion is that FF and Opera use an accelerated display method, but Webkit does NOT. The wine FF might somehow also do that acceleration in Linux, native FF for Linux does apparently not?
I did all the tests with the
I did all the tests with the browser maximized @1920x1200 and it slow down the test a lot!
I retested at maximized
I retested at maximized 1920x1080 in XP with FF and one empty tab and i get
7240ms and 0%+0% CPU
Did u experience the manual scroll lag when u use the mouse on the bar inside the scrollbar? In Chrome and Safari, but not in Firefox and Opera, like I did?
Scroll
The scrolling is quite the same I just see that zooming (ctrl+wheel) in Firefox is very slow compared to Chrome or Safari